Skip to main content

Akrasia

Notes

Claim

When someone acts against his better judgement, i.e lack Self-control is the capacity to regulate behavior against impulses. It is also often called the Insight Gap, when we know what is true/what we need to do, but fail to do so.

Explanation

Knowing is not enough, there is something that holds us back even though we want do Examine your desires not just your actions. This perhaps demonstrate the difference between making a decisions in a real life, vs philosophical experiments where we debate what we would have done behind the Design society as if you don't know your place in it.

This suggests that our behavior is more than just the result of our logical thinking. Considering the power of Emotional hijacking is uncontrolled System 1 dominance over reasoning, there are many cases where we can end up doing things we eventually We regret inaction more than action taken. This can be the result of We prefer immediate benefits over delayed ones, when we "surrender" to our short term Temptations that are hurtful in the long run, and fail to provide meaningful happiness.

That suggests that at least on some level we have an intrapersonal conflict, that two or more voices within ourselves are not in agreement.

Why it matters

Examples

Supporters

Environmental design influences behavior through choice architecture can be a cure for many of those situations.

Opposers

Open questions

Visual

Knowing the right thing doesn't mean we do it

Overview

🔼Topic:: Self-Regulation and Change ↩️Origin:: 🔗Link::

Join the Journey

Philosopher's Code offers practical philosophy

brought to life through simple, thoughtful visuals

Subscribe to start your journey with the Five Quests for a Philosophical Life guide