Skip to main content

Debate

Notes

Claim

Debate is a confrontational form of deliberation. Instead of trying to find together a shared solution, we see the world as a Zero sum game and believe that only one view is correct and possible.

Explanation

Like most competitions, we can treat the debate as an honorable way of figuring out the Truth, or we can do our best to make the other side look weak, unreliable, and break apart their arguments without truly addressing them.

However, for the sake of the truth and logic, a better rebuttal is one the addresses only the core message of the opponent's argument, without attacking their identity, using a straw man, or any other form of manipulation.

Why it matters

Examples

The order of the strengh of your argument is (from low to high):

  1. Name calling
  2. ad hominem (attacking their character)
  3. Responding to tone (how they say it and not what they say)
  4. Contradiction ("strawman" their argument)
  5. Counter argument
  6. Refutation
  7. Refuting their central argument

Supporters

Opposers

Open questions

Visual

Debate treats disagreement as a zero-sum game

Join the Journey

Philosopher's Code offers practical philosophy

brought to life through simple, thoughtful visuals

Subscribe to start your journey with the Five Quests for a Philosophical Life guide